Amarjeet Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-16626-2021 (O&M) - 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16626-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.08.2024 Amarjeet Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. Balwinder Singh Sudan, Advocate for the petitioner 


 
 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J. (ORAL) 1.

The prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to release the pension as well as the unpaid balance of other retiral dues and salary of the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was appointed as Driver in Haryana Roadways on contractual basis on 12.02.2002 and his services were regularised on 13.02.2006, however, New Pension Scheme was made applicable on account of the fact that, it came into operation w.e.f. 01.01.2006. He retired on 30.04.2020, after attaining the age of superannuation. The claim of the petitioner is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Mohinder Singh and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others in CWP-14160-2018, decided on 30.01.2023, against which no LPA has been filed, which relating to the same Department, wherein also the petitioners were appointed on contract basis in the year 2002 and regularised after 01.01.2006. Relevant paras whereof read thus:     



 






CWP-16626-2021 (O&M) - 2-
!
"

#$
 
%%&%%'

!

( 
%
!
"

#$
) 



*
 


  

%+&&%%(
 
,-'

 







!
,
.

 
/ ,.0

&%%(
/ 


,.10
!


 

%%&%%'
 
2 

 



!

  
)




"

#$


)

 
!
 


) 


 


)
"

#$
 
%%&%%'

 ) 
   
 


)
"

  

#

 
3 "



)
 4 
5)#
.

 
4 


 


 



 






#
 
 



"

#$


 


!6
"
 # " 

 #

 -)#
)# 
##
 
!
2 # "

 





 


 
)
 
 "

#
 # 


)#
)#  
7 ##
* 


4 

 
 




  


!"
#
!#
6"
!
.

)-  #
/&0

8 #
9 - 
, 3)
4#
. 
8 #
:#
;;

#

 

 


!6
"
 #
 )
"

#$



)
#

#"
 



) 
;

)


#
 
 



 "
 


  

)
 6

 "

2 # "
  

* 


4 

$
!%




  

 

#
&
# 

 #  
##!<- 7

)



!

 



 # 



#
!"
 

 

=((
##




"

#$
 
)
 

2 # "
 


 




!##
)
 

)

"
 
 
&%%+

!
8

 
 
4)  ,
.

 
/ 
,-0

)



 
!



, 3)
 
.  ! 
%%&%%+
!##

)
# )#

 

  


 
,-&  "

, 3)
4#
. 
8 # 
)


 
)
 "
#  >

 
9%?&%%(
/ 
,-90


!##

 

)
"
)

,7
.

 


# #

 

) 

# )#
 
 #
  


, 3)

.  

&%%+1 .@,
##""

3 "



!##


!

# 
#
)

.

, 3)

)
  )


4  ;
!


)
#



#

CWP-16626-2021 (O&M) - 3- #

 


 

)



 
)


 

"


)  ,



!

 

 




 
"

  
)



 
)

 "

#$

2 # "
 


 

 
 


/0




   


)#



##
)
 

 











   
 
)



!


  







1 3.

Learned State counsel has not been able to controvert the factual position and draw out any distinctive aspects in the aforementioned judgment or cite any contrary law.

4.

In wake of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in Mohinder Singh (supra). (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 02.08.2024 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No