M/S Sahil Kumar Akshay Kumar v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-14075-2015 (O&M) Date of decision:- 10.08.2017 M/s Sahil Kumar Akshay Kumar proprietorship concern through its Proprietor Sh. Prem Kumar son of Sh. Krishan Kumar, Shop No. 54, Old Subzi Mandi, Hisar.

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU Present:- Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, with Mr. Ayuwan Singh, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, and Ms. Rashi Gosain, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

* * * * S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL) The petitioner has only challenged the validity of Rule 3 of the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 2000.

2.

The petitioner does not wish to pursue this challenge. However, any other proceedings in respect of the premises which are the subject matter of the petition may continue. 3.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (S.J. VAZIFDAR) CHIEF JUSTICE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) JUDGE 10.08.2017 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Amodh Sharma 2017.08.11 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh