Jagmal Singh v. Haryana Urban Development Authority And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 14868 of 2014 Decided on : 06.04.2015 Jagmal Singh . . . Petitioner

Versus

Haryana Urban Development Authority and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL PRESENT: Mr. Naveen Kumar Jaglan, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Nara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Atul Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) This Court on July 31, 2014, had issued notice of motion with regard to the allegations made against respondent No.4, for 14.10.2014 and directed to maintain status quo at the site.

2.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed, where in para No.5 of the reply, it has been stated that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Disposed of as infructuous.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (REKHA MITTAL) April 06, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.04.08 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh