Sukhwinder Singh v. Union Territory Chandigarh
/ STATES OF PUNJAB AND ANDIGARH IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE S HARYANA AT CHA (() * + 0 1 2. //%%( (()
%%%3 -.
.
%%%.4
M '
"
!"#$ % & '$
'
"
Mr. ./0 */ !
"
&%
!
! "#$
% .1 1
#2#,
&
#"2 #2#, 34 4 68
' !
! ( !
(5 .
,+"2#
#2 + ! 6#2 #2 % %
5 ! #6
)* ! +$, ! ! ,+ -
! !* #
!
* !
* !
- 9 -/ * * #2"#2## - ! & !
& - !
-!
!! - - * & !
- -//- ! 7-
( !
! !* -
-
! ! ! $#
9 9 :
!)/ - **!
- 1 &
(5 & *
-
/ !
* !
!
* *9! * , ! !
* * *
! !* -
* !
5
* 6 5 / !
!
/
* ! !
" ;
;/ !
/
*
! ! $#
! * !* * !
5 *
!
* #"2 #2#,
** & -
!
& !
* < * ! !
-
=* *
/
#2## ! - - -
!/ !
!1 /
!
!* *
#"2 #2#,
-
!
!* !
!
!
!
* -
/ !
4! !- !
-/
/
! $# #3 8
! ! !
R Rohit Kumar Vs. S State of Delhi : 2008 Crl. J. 2561 1. > ( (
* *
/
!
!
!* / !* - 4!
"
#2##
-
! / *!
!
!
- / - !
-
! $#3# #8
!
!*
! * !
!
!
- - / - !
!!
? *
4 *!
!
* - !
!!
* !
!
!
- / !
!*
4 *!
!
! 38 3!8 ! $#3#838 8
!
: !/ : !/ / - !
* -
/
!
!* *
! /!
! ! !
Pawan Kum mar Gupta Vs. The State of W.
B. :
1368. 1973 CriLJ 1 $ !!
/-
! *
/ /-
- -
/ !
- * #"2 #2#,34 68
' ! (
6 !
(5.
,+" 2#
# #2 + ! 6#2 #2 %
5 !
! #6
)* ! +$, ! ! ,+ -
! ! * & -
& ! * + 0 /- ! :
! /*! !
-
2#-1 *
* :!
7
!
2
!
*
5*! !
- * *
* /(% 7 . 51 .
55 8 .
892 4: 1 2. 1 .%); 8 4. 8 4 3 98 $ $:45.< =51
% (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE //%%(()
Yes/No Whether r speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether r reportable