Shesh Nath v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 670 of 2017 Decided on : 02.06.2017 Shesh Nath . . . Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU PRESENT: Mr. Anoop Singh Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(b) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 (for brevity 'the Act'), seeking release on parole for one month to enable the petitioner to get his house repaired.

2.

It has been averred in the petition that in case FIR No.494, dated 26.12.2010, under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, 1985 and 467, 468, 471, 420 of IPC, registered at Police Station City Bahadurgarh, the petitioner has been awarded 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of ` One lakh and in default of payment of fine, further undergo simple imprisonment for offence punishable under Section 20 of the NDPS Act. 3.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusal of the of the petition, we find that no material has been placed on record to substantiate the fact that the house of the petitioner is in bad condition and the same needs to be repaired.

Jawala Ram 2017.06.05 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP No. 670 of 2017 - 2 - 4.

In view of the above, we do not find any ground to grant the benefit of parole to the petitioner.

5.

Dismissed.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU) June 02, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.06.05 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh