Jiyona Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH (Through Video Conferencing) CRM-M-29950-2020 Date of Decision:September 28, 2020 Jiyona Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR
Present:
Mr.Avtar Singh Khinda, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Hittan Nehra, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
........
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner while praying for anticipatory bail submitted that he has only been named by the co-accused and nothing has been recovered from him.
No doubt the petitioner has been named by the co-accused but the fact remains that the petitioner has been named as the person who supplied the drugs to the main accused from whom the recovery is effected. Hence, his custodial interrogation is necessary to find out the source of said intoxicant injections. Moreover, three other cases are also pending against the petitioner.
Hence, the present petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed. September 28, 2020 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.
Whether speaking/reasoned ?
Yes/No 2.
Whether reportable ?
Yes/No MEENU 2020.09.28 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh