Sumit v. State Of Haryana And ANR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 780 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- November 21, 2017 Sumit
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Heard.
No speaking order has been passed by the Superintendent, District Jail, Jhajjar rejecting the representation of the petitioner for grant of parole. The petition is disposed of directing Superintendent, District Jail, Jhajjar to look into the representation of the petitioner and then to dispose of it off vide a detailed and well reasoned order within three weeks of the petitioner submitting representation in his office. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE November 21, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.11.21 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh