The Haryana State Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd v. Presiding Officer Industrial Cum Labour Court

VINOD KUMAR 2015.08.10 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.14350 of 2015 [ 1 ] ******

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.14350 of 2015 Date of decision:04.08.2015 The Haryana Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., Rohtak

...Petitioner

Versus

Presiding Officer and another

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

The petitioner has challenged the award dated 29.04.2015 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Rohtak, by which the respondent no.2-workman has been held entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of demand notice. The only argument raised by counsel for the petitioner is that services of respondent no.2-workman were not terminated rather he had abandoned the job.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

The learned Court below has threadbare discussed the evidence available on record about the abandonment of job by respondent no.2workman in para 11 of the award. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to dislodge the said findings because if respondent no.2-workman was

VINOD KUMAR 2015.08.10 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.14350 of 2015 [ 2 ] ****** absenting himself, the petitioner should have served a letter/notice to him to join the duties, but there is no evidence in this regard. In view thereof, there is no reason for this Court to interfere in the award of the Labour Court.

Dismissed.

August 04, 2015 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge