Atul Kumar & ANR v. Reserve Bank Of India & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-13401-2016 Date of decision: 04.08.2016 Atul Kumar and others ..... Petitioners

Versus

Reserve Bank of India and others ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for Mr. DS Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioners.

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the respondents to accept the offer send to them vide letter dated 17.03.2016 (Annexure P-4).

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the bank has already taken the possession, therefore, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3.

Disposed of as infructuous.

( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE August 04, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2016.08.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document