← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/26332/2026disposed of

Ankit v. State Of Haryana

2026-05-11Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-26332-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26332-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 ANKIT .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Pardeep Balyan, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS (Section 482 Cr.P.C) for quashing of order dated 19.03.2026 passed by ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Jagadhari in SC No. 385 of 2022 arising out of FIR No. 408 dated 13.09.2022 under Sections 401, 398,341,201 of IPC and 25 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar District Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari Haryana vide which bail order of the petitioner has been cancelled and bail bonds and surety bonds have been forfeited and warrants of arrest has been issued against the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before the learned trial Court as the counsel for the petitioner mistakenly noted wrong date as 09.04.2026 instead of 19.03.2026. Consequently, the learned trial Court cancelled the bail orders of the petitioner and his bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forfeited to the State RENU RAWAT 2026.05.11 17.56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-26332-2026 and petitioner was ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants of arrest. He further prays that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the proceedings before the Court and the impugned order dated 19.03.2026 be set aside.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

On the asking of Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 19.03.2026 passed by ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Jagadhari. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 05 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the trial Court is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of 3 days.

7.

With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 11.05.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.05.11 17.56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh