Gurpreet Kaur v. State Of Punjab & ORS




    
  





CWP-13548-2016



  
 


 

   

 State of Punjab and Others




          
   

  


!"


#
$"



 
%


    

 &


'%#
$
!

(
   



 )%
 * 
& 

%
  


  

 
+ %'
%
  


%
    



  '
%
 

%


   
 
 &,*
  #

-%%
,

 
  ,
 
%


   

   #
,& 
% 
 *   )%
%( 

%


   
- 
 




 

(,

%

*

#
..#
% - "

#
- 
& 
 &
 "
"
 



/0#




% "'
   
/
*



 " #

 

( '
( 


 &
 *  

*

#

&  %


 *
1 )%
",

, 
% ,, ''
%
   #
- 
  ,*
 



%


%

%
  & 
- ,
  
%
 

,  
 
' 
    *
(   #
-%%
- 
% ,
(*
3
$ ,,

4 

- ,,



', 
 
$

,
5 - "

#
"
 



/#
$ 2
6#

%
7
% "

(


% ,


  , 
 
%
 
(   
8
%
 '

#

   


& 

%
!'&  

  !""#$ %!&'State of Punjab and Others, CWP-6036-2020, decided on 08.02.2024, Ex. Constable Satnam Singh vs. State MOHIT 2025.01.20 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-13548-2016 

()( of Punjab, CWP-15475-1995, decided on 18.07.1996, Major G.S. Sodhi vs. Union of India, 1991 (2) SCC 371, wherein relying on Rule 16.2 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

4.

The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel sought instructions and thus states that the respondents would not be averse to having a relook at the matter and decided afresh within a period of 6 months.

5.

The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to her and shall contain reason, whereupon the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon.

         )**+)*), 

&

9%

% 


:';

  

< 

;

= 9%

% 
  

(,

< 

;

=

MOHIT 2025.01.20 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document