Dayal Singh And ANR. v. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Panchkula And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.17009 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 08.09.2022 DAYAL SINGH AND ANR.

....Petitioners vs.

COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PANCHKULA & ORS.

....Respondents *** BEFORE :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL *** Present :- Mr. Samar Partap Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

*** Sudhir Mittal, J. (Oral) CM No. 14028-CWP-2022 This application has been filed for placing on record true typed copy of Annexure P-2 and legible copy of Annexure P-3. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed and documents aforementioned are taken on record.

CWP No. 17009 of 2022 It is submitted that appeal was filed on 13.05.2022. According to the instructions, the Appellate Authority is supposed to decide appeal within a period of two months. Said period has elapsed but no order has been passed. Thus, a direction be issued to respondent No.1 to decide the pending appeal within a time bound manner.

Notice of motion.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3 and waives service.

POONAM RATHORE 2022.09.08 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.17009 of 2022 (O&M) -2At the asking of the Court, Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 also and waives service. Considering the nature of order being passed, no reply is necessary. The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the pending appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any case, not later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. September 08, 2022 ( SUDHIR MITTAL) poonam JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No POONAM RATHORE 2022.09.08 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document