Raj Kumar v. C.I.T. Income Tax Office, Chd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

ITA No. 104 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.1.2016 Mr. Raj Kumar ....Appellant.

Versus

CIT, Chandigarh

...Respondent.

1.

Whether the Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG.

PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

For orders, see ITA No. 47 of 2005 (Mr. Surender Paul v. CIT, Chandigarh).

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE January 18, 2016 (RAJ RAHUL GARG) gbs JUDGE GURBACHAN SINGH 2016.03.01 11:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh