Harnek Singh v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-13737-2016 Date of decision: - 05.02.2020 Harnek Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

Pepsu Road Transport Commission and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate for Mr. Simranjeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Neha Sharma, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Arora, Advocate for the respondents-PRTC.

**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that unfortunately during the pendency of the writ petition, petitioner has died and no LR(s) has approached to him for being impleaded as party so as to continue with the present proceedings.

Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

The legal heirs of the petitioner would be at liberty to revive this writ petition in case anything survives therein. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) February 05, 2020 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

No Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2020.02.06 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh