Trilochan Singh Anand v. State Of Punjab And Others

-1CWP-15748 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (PROCEEDINGS THROUGH V.C.) CWP-15748 of 2020 Date of Decision: 10.03.2021 Trilochan Singh Anand

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA Present:- Mr. R.D. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Anju Arora, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr. Harsh Bunger, Advocate, for respondent No.7. AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL) We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and also have gone through the replies with the respective stands taken by the respondents and are of the considered view that as of now the aspect which needs to be taken note of is that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 04.09.2020 (Annexure P5) addressed to the respondents and keeping in view the status in law and the statutes applicable, the said representation needs to be considered and decided by the Chief Commissioner/Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar - respondent No.5.

A direction is issued to respondent No.5 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar, to consider and take a decision on the RAVINDER SINGH 2021.03.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CWP-15748 of 2020 representation/complaint dated 04.09.2020 (Annexure P-5) within a period of six weeks from today. Decision so taken be conveyed to the petitioner.

(Augustine George Masih) Judge (Ashok Kumar Verma) March 10, 2021 Judge R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2021.03.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document