Jarnailo Devi v. Presiding Officer Labour Court Ambala And ANR
VINOD KUMAR 2015.07.31 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.14754 of 2015 Date of decision:23.07.2015 Smt. Jarnailo Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
Presiding Officer and another
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present:
Mr. Hari Om Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
***** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
The petitioner has challenged the award of the Labour Court, Ambala, dated 26.02.2015, by which the industrial dispute filed by the petitioner and referred to the Labour Court by the Government has been declined.
The case set up by the petitioner was that she was employed in place of her deceased husband as Class-IV employee and her services were terminated by respondent no.2, without following the mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. However, the Labour Court has recorded a categoric finding on the basis of evidence available on record that the petitioner has failed to prove that she had been given employment after the death of her husband, what to talk of termination of her services. Counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any error in the order of the Labour Court insofar as the appreciation of facts are concerned nor could highlight the evidence which has not been considered. In view thereof, I do not find any merit in the present petition and hence, the same is hereby dismissed.
July 23, 2015 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge