Darshan Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.112 CRM-M No.31987 of 2022 Date of Decision: 25.07.2022 Darshan Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) Mr. Amrik Narwal, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance and on the instructions from ASI Satish Kumar from Police Station Jind Sadar, District Jind, he apprises the Court that the investigation proceedings have already been concluded in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.60 dated 11.02.2022 registered at the above-said Police Station, under Sections 148, 149, 285 & 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and the final report/ Challan has also been presented in the competent Court on 10.05.2022. In view of the above-discussed submission as made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition while submitting that in the afore-said changed circumstances, the petitioner would avail the appropriate NEETU RANI 2022.07.25 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC

CRM-M No.31987 of 2022 -2- .....

alternative and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to him under law, to seek the redressal of his grievance, as set-forth in this petition. Learned State counsel has no objection for the withdrawal of this petition.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 25.07.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.07.25 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC