← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27031/2025disposed of

Satnam Singh v. State Of Punjab

2025-05-16Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-27031-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27031-2025 Date of Decision: 16.05.2025 SATNAM SINGH .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Aditya Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of impugned orders dated 17.02.2024, 28.05.2024, 18.07.2024, 28.08.2024, 05.10.2024, 07.11.2024, 07.12.2024, 08.01.2025, 24.02.2025, 29.03.2025 and 05.05.2025 (Annexure P8 to P18) passed by learned Judge Special Court, Kapurthala in case NDPS-222-2022 arising out of FIR No. 35 dated 10.05.2021 under Sections 22-61-85 NDPS Act registered at Police Station Bholath, District Kapurthala whereby the bail of the petitioner was cancelled, summons through non-bailable warrants of arrest and proclamation proceedings have been initiated against him under Section 84, BNSS 2023 on the ground that the impugned orders are not sustainable under the law with a further prayer for issuance of directions to learned trial Court to admit the petitioner to bail at the time of his surrender. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before the Court below as he wrongly noted the date. As such Renu Rawat 2025.05.16 05:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-27031-2025 his bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forfeited vide order dated 17.02.2024. Non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner have been issued. He further contends that the petitioner may be permitted to surrender before the learned trial Court to attend the trial proceedings regularly and, therefore, requests that the impugned order may be set aside. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

 

  

    

   





  

   !



!   

 

  

   5.

I have heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the case file.

6.

In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court deemed it appropriate to decide the petition, I do not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned orders passed by the learned Judge Special Court, Kapurthala. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the Court below within 07 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court below within a period of three days.

7.

The petition stands disposed of.

(H.S.GREWAL) 16.05.2025 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.05.16 05:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document