M/S Amrit Lal Nagpal v. State Of Haryana And ORS

I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH CWP- 10358- 2017 ( O&M) Dat e of deci si on: - 15. 05. 2017 M/ s Amr i t Lal Nagpal Cont r act or . . . Pet i t i oner Ver sus St at e of Har yana and ot her s . . . Respondent s CORAM: HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE S. J. VAZI FDAR, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE ANUPI NDER SI NGH GREWAL Pr esent : - Mr . Vi kr am Si ngh, Advocat e, f or t he pet i t i oner .

* * * * S. J. VAZI FDAR, C. J. ( ORAL) The pet i t i oner had ent er ed i nt o a cont r act wi t h t he r espondent s f or de- si l t i ng. The pet i t i oner ' s gr i evance i s t hat t he quant i t i es of sand and si l t ment i oned i n t he e- auct i on not i ce ar e not cor r ect . The pet i t i oner cont ends t hat t her e was no sand and t hat t he quant i t y of si l t was l ess t han what was gi ven i n t he e- auct i on not i ce.

2.

These ar e cont r act ual di sput es whi ch al so i nvol ve di sput ed quest i ons of f act . The same cannot be consi der ed i n t hi s wr i t pet i t i on.

3.

The onl y r el i ef we ar e i ncl i ned t o gr ant t he pet i t i oner i s t o di r ect t he r espondent s t o r espond t o t he pet i t i oner ' s l et t er dat ed 25. 04. 2017 i n due cour se. I t i s cl ar i f i ed t hat t hi s or der does not r ef l ect upon t he mer i t s of t he r i val cases. 4.

The wr i t pet i t i on i s accor di ngl y di sposed of . ( S. J. VAZI FDAR) CHI EF JUSTI CE ( ANUPI NDER SI NGH GREWAL) JUDGE

15. 05. 2017 Amodh Whet her speaki ng/ r easoned Yes/ No Whet her r epor t abl e Yes/ No Amodh Sharma 2017.05.16 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh