High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/2131/2012disposed of

Suraj Bhan v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2016-04-04Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 2131 of 2012 Date of Decision:- 04.04.2016 Suraj Bhan ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Keshav Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. **** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the petitioner has been promoted and granted notional date of promotion as Mechanical Chargeman w.e.f. 13.09.2010 instead of 04.09.2013 i.e. the date on which his immediate junior, namely, Sapattar Singh was promoted as Mechanical Chargeman. The seniority of the petitioner as Mechanical Chargeman has also been assigned over and above his immediate junior as per order dated 28.02.2014 (Annexure R-2).

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the necessary relief for fixation of pay and arrears has not been granted till date.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file representation qua the above-said benefits after the order dated 28.02.2014 (Annexure R-2) to the respondents. April 04, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.04.08 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh