Jai Kishan v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission

CWP No.17520 of 2019 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.17520 of 2019 Date of decision:18.10.2019 Jai Kishan ... Petitioner Vs.

Haryana Staff Selection Commission ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr.Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Prayer in present writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing approach of the respondent whereby candidature of petitioner on the post of MPHW in the category of BCA under OSP (Handicapped) category has not been considered. Notice of motion.

On asking of Court, Mr.Hitesh Pandit, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent/State.

Mr.Parminder Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner, at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondent to consider and decide representation dated 20.06.2019, (Annexure P-8) within some specified time. SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.22 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No.17520 of 2019 {2} In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into merit of case or commenting thereon, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the representation dated 20.06.2019 (Annexure P-8) by passing a well reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, representation is not decided within aforementioned specified time, there shall be costs of Rs.25,000/- to be paid by the concerned officer to the petitioner.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE October 18, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.10.22 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh