High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1571/2014disposed of

Roshan Lal v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd And ORS

2015-03-10Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal2 pages

C.W.P No.1571 of 2014 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.1571 of 2014 Date of Decision : 10.03.2015 Roshan Lal ...... Petitioner

Versus

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :

Mr. B.K. Bagri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Poonia, Advocate for the respondents.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) By this petition the petitioner has claimed that his workcharge/daily wages services should be counted for retiral benefits. In the written statement, this argument was accepted and it was stated that during the pendency of the writ petition the respondents had counted his work-charge service for pension and had granted him the necessary relief.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that to that extent the petition has been rendered infructuous but even now there is some anomaly

C.W.P No.1571 of 2014 -2between the sanctioned amount and the amount actually disbursed. Learned counsel for the respondents states that once the amounts have been sanctioned their should not be any such anomaly but in case the petitioners is aggrieved by any such action he may move a representation in this regard to the respondent No.2 and the same shall be redressed.

I find this to be a fair solution. In the circumstances, even while disposing the writ petition as having been rendered infructuous the liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a representation to the respondent No.2 regarding anomaly in sanction order/s within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and the respondent No.2 shall decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter and within that time also release the petitioner all dues which he may found entitled. It is clarified that in case any due relief is not granted to the petitioner within the aforesaid period he would be entitled to claim the same with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date/s the amount/s fell due till payment/s.

Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) March 10, 2015 JUDGE ashish