Bhawna Narang And ANR v. Lalit Mohan Narang
CRR(F)-407-2018 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH (218) CRR(F)-407-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 30.07.2025 Bhawna Narang and another ......Petitioners
Versus
Lalit Mohan Narang ......Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****
Present:
Mr. IPS Mangat, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Seema Pasricha, Advocate for the respondent. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1.
The present petition has been filed setting aside the judgment dated 22.05.2018 passed by learned Principal District Judge, Family Court, Karnal, whereby, the petitioners were granted meager amount of maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month, which is inadequate and the same needs to be enhanced.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that vide order dated 08.07.2022, the claim qua petitioner No. 1 has been rendered infructuous as she has already re-married. As regards the claim of petitioner No. 2 is concerned, learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner No. 2 has already filed a petition under Section 128 of Cr.P.C. before the Court below and hence, the present petition would not survive. PARUL 2025.08.01 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRR(F)-407-2018 (O&M) 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner could not deny the fact that the entire arrears have been duly paid during the execution and the petition under Section 128 of Cr.P.C. is pending before the trial Court. 4.
In light of the above, the prayer made in the present petition would not survive and hence, the present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, however, the dismissal of this petition shall not be an impediment on the rights of petitioner No. 2 to contest the petition under Section 128 of Cr.P.C.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 30.07.2025 Parul Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No PARUL 2025.08.01 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document