← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/29619/2024dismissed

Dharmbir v. State Of Haryana

2024-06-14Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil6 pages

 

         

   

 



   

 

  

        

  

 

  

          





  !

" # $%&$'

()*+,- !

   # $%& "  "

  (  )*+ , -..

-- /0 -/-%   %-% %-0 0/. %/1 -/2 *"

-0 +#  5

  #   

 # 

-     

  )*+

2 

      



   ! "#$%&' '

(  )  '' 

*    "

)  

+

, ) )) 



+ 

)- ./#/.0



-

-

     * "

- " )

 ."    )  )

 - ! "-)-       "

-  ) 

')  



'' "



'-  )    "

-

"" ) "-    ) 



-" '

)

 "

-



  ' -

)'

  

''  '' )*  )      1 ''

1 -

-' 

)

)! 

 "

-  )

''  - - 



- )"



 )   ')   '

)"-

' 2 !$2  ,'

)  

  "

-   

)  

'   )) )  "

  &  ) !$3 ') 4

')  

  '  

)  )

)  &  )  )      

- 

    '

        ')  

      "

 

-' ,

  '

'     

)

) - ! ) ''

 

56

 )

 ' )

  -

'

- '

'  ')  "    

'  ! "  !$  '    

)

7789:77#..$#$.0!&! ", + 

)- .$#$.0

'    )''

.



    "   

   6   

   )   

,);

 

 )  )

!2-,!! :%<2 (900  

 2(

")  2(-

  )

'    2(

"

 "   )

 

0%=#%80:5.#/#:/#9 ,,    <(; -     )  )<2 (900, '

'  

 )   "



 

 '

 ')"  

  

;'  !>   ') "   

  

  2 ! 2 ;  "

" )  !<

. 

)  "

         

 56 <,3!&5?,@!@6<!$55

& ..$#$.0,.0%52 @ %/.88) )..%#.%.0 ' )  ,(5 ' !

<", ) !  0%=#%80:5).#/#:/#9,,5 ' !

3

)



))

    "-  

   ' 

  2  <(  , 2 

! "3

)

5 ' 



!

 &

-

 5 ' *  !



>  ,5! "3

);(  ' "      

 !<!>





 

'

' 

'   

, )<2 900) 

 )       





)  

)  ,!4 ) :0%A % )/-$/-&)/ / 0$,1%'

)'

-,$ 2$-&-&)/$3 6  

    ( )*+

   

'  ( ' '8



    ( 2

 + 

  5  (  

  

5 7   *

 '



      

#

 

 

 5   



 (

 *  2

 (

' #5

  

 5  

  /. -/-% :; 21<

 :; 2.< 

/ 0$,1%'

)'

-,$

-1-$ 6  #  "

 5

      5 

  55  '5

 

 ' (

   '  $ /1%4(&(

 5        7 5 5 



 8  '  * 

   

='

#(    ( 5 5 

 5

 9.0B*'   )    

'   C

  

-"'



)  

  

' 

  ' '

 ' 

    

)  C' ) )   ' '

'  (   C ' 

-  9.:  

 

 "  ''-  ) )  "- )       

 )



  

' 

"

 

' )  

       '   )  

  

-"'

   *





 

)

D  ''- ) 

)  ' ) 

" 

 )C



 ) ) )     ) "( 

 )

A #(

     !"# $  %

&!



='

#(



5    )  

)



)  -"''- C  

  )        )  



 )  C

 "' 

 

    

 

' )C   





A



 , without going into the merits, a mere reference is sufficient enough to record that actually the case was heard at length during the course of hearing of first anticipatory bail petition(Annexure P-3) and there is no such change of factual aspects or any other new ground raised by the counsel for the petitioner today before this Court.

Accordingly, the second or subsequent bail application under S $%& Cr.P.C., can be filed, if there is a change in the fact-situation or in law, 7 8  7 '5  7  7  5 '( ' 

 (  ;

'($) *+ ,$ - .

/ 7   

  7 7 7 55  ( 

 

  il and unless there is change in the circumstances. $6&(&)/ This Court is, therefore, of the considered view after having examined the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and the ambit of Section 438 Cr.P.C., this petition fails. Hence, holding that second anticipatory bail in such circumstances is not maintainable, the petition is ordered to be dismissed.

 However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. "

  #

 



 @  *  $   ) + $@

*

"'

+ $@