High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/7122/2022disposed of

Ved Parkash v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2022-07-26Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.119 CRWP No.7122 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.07.2022 Ved Parkash

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Bharat Puri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as regards the prayer as made by the petitioner in his representation Annexure P-5 qua taking legal action against the persons named therein, he (petitioner) would be availing the appropriate alternative and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to him under law, for this purpose and so far as his prayer for the protection of his life and liberty is concerned, he would be moving a fresh representation to respondent No.3Senior Superintendent of Police, S.B.S. Nagar, exclusively praying therein for the above-said protection only but he prays that the said respondent be directed to look into and take appropriate action on the fresh representation of the petitioner within some specific time frame and the present petition may be disposed of accordingly.

Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the NEETU RANI 2022.07.26 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC

CRWP No.7122 of 2022 (O&M) -2- .....

respondent-State in advance, has no objection to the afore-discussed submission as well as the prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Resultantly, the petition in hand stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 that in case the petitioner moves any fresh representation to him specifically restricting his prayer therein to the protection of his life and liberty only, he shall look into the same and if the petitioner would be found to be genuinely deserving the said protection, then he shall take appropriate action, in accordance with law, in the given set of the facts and circumstances of the matter, preferably within a period of 10 (ten) days.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 26.07.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.07.26 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC