Pinki v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33151-2022 Date of Decision: 29.07.2022 Pinki ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ........ Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Naresh Chander, Advocate for Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance direction to respondents No. 2 & 3 to protect the dignity of petitioner and directing the respondent No.4 not to harass the petitioner by repeatedly raiding the house of the petitioner.

Notice served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied in case directions may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 07.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) in a time bound manner. The prayer being innocuous is not opposed by the learned State counsel. Given above, respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar to decide the representation dated 07.07.2022 (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order within thirty working days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the grievance of the petitioner still exists, she shall be at liberty to avail legal remedy in accordance with law including approaching this Court. The present petition is partly allowed. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.07.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.08.02 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document