Satish Kumar Chauhan v. Presiding Officer Labour Court & ORS.

CWP-24123-2011 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24123-2011 Decided on : 27.02.2024 Satish Kumar Chauhan . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Sikandh Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner - Satish Kumar Chauhan (workman), by challenging the award dated 28.07.2010 (Annexure P-4), passed by the learned Labour Court, Ambala, whereby, reference No.204/2008, filed under Sections 10(1)(C) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short, 'ID Act'), has been answered against him. 2.

At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that despite making best efforts, petitioner - Satish Kumar Chauhan (workman), has not contacted his office since long. Therefore, he is unable to address arguments being not fully aware of the latest status of the facts. 3.

In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option except to dispose of the writ petition for want of prosecution.

JAWALA RAM 2024.03.01 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-24123-2011 - 2 - 4.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within eight weeks from today, in case, any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the petitioner.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE February 27, 2024 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No  Whether Reportable:

Yes/No  JAWALA RAM 2024.03.01 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document