← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/10748/2017disposed of

Deep Darshan Singh An Dors. v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2017-05-18Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10748 of 2017 Date of decision: 18.05.2017 Deep Darshan Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab & others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Harmender Goswami, Advocate, for the petitioners.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners herein contends that the issue involved in the instant writ petition is covered by the judgment rendered by this court in Civil Writ Petition No.2371 of 2010 titled as 'Harbans Lal vs. State of Punjab and others', decided on 31.08.2010 (Annexure P-8).

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners herein seeking the same benefit, served a legal notice dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-13) upon the respondents, which is still pending consideration. It is also contended that a resolution has already been taken by respondent No.3 in this regard, which is dated 11.05.2016 (Annexure P-11), which is pending approval with respondent No.2. Learned counsel for the petitioners limits his prayer that directions may be issued to the respondents to decide legal notice dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-13) served by the petitioners upon the respondents as expeditiously as possible. Notice of motion.

Satyawan 2017.05.19 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No. 10748 of 2017 -2On the asking of the court Mr. R.S. Sidhu, AAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. Let four copies of the paper book be served upon him during the course of the day. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the limited prayer, I dispose of the writ petition by directing respondents to decide the legal notice dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-13) served by the petitioners upon the respondents as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

18.05.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.05.19 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh