Naveen Thakran v. Kavita Khakran

CRR(F)-74-2018 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Revision(F)-74-2018 Date of Decision: 20.3.2018 Naveen Thakran ......Petitioner

Versus

Kavita Thakran .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.11.2017 passed by the Family Court, Bhiwani.

I have heard the counsel for the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the impugned order was passed without taking into consideration the real facts and the petitioner was junior to a Lawyer who died sometime in August 2017 and the petitioner has no source of income and he is not in a position to pay the maintenance and the petitioner was suffering from depression. The counsel refers to Annexures P-6 and P-7.

On perusal of the record it is found that the parties had been referred for mediation but compromise could not be effected. The petitioner got his statement recorded that he was ready to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the wife from the date of the application. It is on the basis of the statement made by the petitioner that the Court directed the husband to pay the interim maintenance @ Rs. 5,000/- per month. It was a Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.03.27 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRR(F)-74-2018 -2consent order. The petitioner wants to wriggle out of the statement. The order was passed on the concession given by the petitioner himself, he cannot be permitted to turn around and challenge it. The petition is dismissed in limine.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE March 20, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.03.27 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh