High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/7857/2020disposed of

Vicky And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

2020-09-30Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

CRWP No.7857 of 2020 ..1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.106 CRWP No.7857 of 2020 Date of Decision: 30th September, 2020.

Vicky & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab & Ors.

...Respondents

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Inderjeet Singh Chawla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms. Bhavna Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA (ORAL ) By way of the instant petition, the petitioners have sought the indulgence of this Court for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and personal liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8 because they (petitioners) have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of these respondents. A further prayer has also been made to direct respondents No. 1 to 3 to restrain respondents No. 4 to 8 from interfering in their (petitioners') married life. It has also been mentioned in the petition that the petitioners have already moved a representation (Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, on 27.09.2020, in this regard.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only. SEEMA SHARMA 2020.09.30 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP No.7857 of 2020 ..2..

At the asking of the Court, Ms. Bhavna Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer to issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to take appropriate action on the said representation (Annexure P-4).

Learned counsel for the State has no objection for the same. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the marriage, as stated to have been solemnized between the petitioners, respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, is hereby directed to look into the said representation (Annexure P-4) and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

This petition stands disposed of.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE 30.09.2020.

seema Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether Reportable?

Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2020.09.30 15:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document