M/S Pots And Plants v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
CWP No. 18620 of 2013 -1-
!"
#
!"
#$ % &&&&&
In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the validity of the order dated 31.12.2010 and 21.04.2011 vide Annexures P-8 and P-9 respectively. On 31.12.2010, the respondentAssistant Provident Fund Commissioner proceeded to pass an order under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952 (for short the 'EPF' Act). It was an ex-parte order. The petitioner was directed to deposit the balance of amount of $ $% & '( " # ) #* "
+( ,, -#.*(
"# # (23 1 ##
$ "
# -' ""4 .
(
CWP No. 18620 of 2013 -21
-#3 # 55 # 6 (23 1 !-' ""4 ' #"
# $ '(4 5, ( "
#, # (231
%
+( $( .
(
7 , ( -4#*
"# # 1#0 6 (231 8 # 4
( " -(54* ## ((" ( .,- ""
* ## -# ( / 0 ( 23 "
#, 9 -#
5 (
##
$ "" # .(4 (#" 5 +( ( 1
-#3 # 55 "
## "
# / 0 ( 25"4 *:
-# 3 # 1 ;
" +(
-' ""4 ' # ' 5 4 ' "4#
# ( '(5
-'
/" ' ( # ( 5 5 . 5##
( # $ 4 # 4
( "
# .5# (#",-, ""
* (.4(5$" (- 5
' # .
( 1
-# 3 # 55 ( / 0 1 "
#, +(
$ ( 4 (
"# # / 0 ( 23 1 ##
3 ( " (- 5# -' (
( -' ""4 < -' ( 0 "
#, 9 ' ( ## ( ( " ( 4# (-
# 5#* ""4.
(1""44
# 0 ( ( (#$((
# 4, -'""4 #
CWP No. 18620 of 2013 -3- / 0 6 ( 23 1 2-$ #"
4 -' ""4 $((# 5#* ""4.
(1""44
+( 5 ( . ;( # +(
$ '
" 4 5.4 = #$4 # 4
.
((" 4
"# # / 0 1$ ( ( .( # +(
$5 7 . 5## (1
-#3 # 55 &> ? #41 (
* # / 0 ( 23 1 ## "
#, ( ,-, # ""
* ( "
+(
##
#
%
1;
# @ # +( " # # #"
5 $ $% & (23" 5'(" # '
5 (
5 #* +( "
(
A# "
- # # "" .
( 1
-# 3 # 55 &> ? #4 1 (
* ( # '< -5. $ # 7
;, # ( , +($ ( 1
-# 3 # 55 # # ; # ( , "
# # (231# 5"4"
#,.* 4'< ? *$ 9 ( 0 1 "
#, ( # 5 ,(" ((* 4.4 "*(# 5#5
(5 ( "
# 4.4 4-* ##5,
CWP No. 18620 of 2013 -4-
# '(
* "
- ( "
( -," #
5? *
5. $ 1
#,4*$" ##"
# !"#$ %&'() sahil soni