Buta Singh v. State Of Punjab & ORS
!
"#$#%& ' ' (
'''
# #% )
*++
+ , +
''' $-%!
% $ .
& /0 .'
+
+ .
+
+
!"#$
% &
' ()* ++++ + .
+
+
'203 ,
$ $- ./ $0$-12/ -3
.4 ' **11* 21,2 6 $-. -12 3 $- 0
- /7 3
8 .211572115
0 6$ $ 91 ,, 21,*:4(
:' **11* 21,2 3 $ / 4 $ $$ -
$
2;
21,;:4* :
< / 2(= . -12 $ - 2115/ 0. -// 0/ >= ,2 %# < 292115$ $// $0$- $-.
(
< $/ . -$ 2;
21,;44 $/.$- 0 = 44 $$
*
$
;
? ? 292115 :$-.
292115$ 4
23. Transfer of property to be void in certain circumstances: Where any senior citizen who, after the commencement of this Act, has transferred by way of gift or otherwise, his property, subject to the condition that the transferee shall provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor and such transferee refuses or fails to provide such amenities and physical needs, the said transfer of property shall be deemed to have been made by fraud or coercion or under undue influence and shall at the option of the transferor be declared void by the Tribunal.
(2) Where any senior citizen has a right to receive maintenance out of an estate and such estate or part thereof is transferred, the right to receive maintenance may be enforced against the transferee if the transferee has notice of the right, or if the transfer is gratuitous; but not against the transferee for consideration and without notice of right. (3) If, any senior citizen is incapable of enforcing the rights under sub$sections (1) and (2), action may be taken on his
behalf by any of the organisation referred to in Explanation to sub$section (1) of section 5.
292115$$- @$
/ #/ ' ,5(212, ASudesh Chhikara vs Ramti Devi" 1; ,2 2122 ' ,9,(#/4 "13.
When a senior citizen parts with his or her property by executing a gift or a release or otherwise in favour of his or her near and dear ones, a condition of looking after the senior citizen is not necessarily attached to it. On the contrary, very often, such transfers are made out of love and affection without any expectation in return. Therefore, when it is alleged that the conditions mentioned in sub$section (1) of Section 23 are attached to a transfer, existence of such conditions must be established before the Tribunal. 14.
Careful perusal of the petition under Section 23 filed by respondent no.1 shows that it is not even pleaded that the release deed was executed subject to a condition that the transferees (the daughters of respondent no.1) would provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to respondent no.1. Even in the impugned order dated 22nd May 2018 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal, no such finding has been recorded. It seems that oral evidence was not adduced by the parties. As can be seen from the impugned judgment of the Tribunal, immediately after a reply was filed by the appellant that the petition was fixed for arguments. Effecting transfer subject to a condition of providing the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor - senior citizen is sine qua non for applicability of sub$section (1) of Section 23. In the present case, as stated earlier, it is not even pleaded by respondent no.1 that the release deed was executed subject to such a condition."
(
>
$ $ 29 2115 $ -.? $#2115 - . $0
$/ / / $# 292115 C/ /. $ /$ ,1
/-$./ 6. /-0/ 0.?-/
,,
$ $$-:2115 '
,2
=$/$- 91 ,, 21,*:4( 2;
21,;
:4* / -/$-. ' **11* 21,2- $- . -
4
2;
21,; ? - ,9
' * -- / . / - /$
' ' (
2+ .
+
+ Nisha Yadav
Whether reasoned/speaking?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No