Tek Ram v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11072 of 2017 Date of decision:22.05.2017 Tek Ram ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr.B.S.Chahar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that private respondent, who is a Sarpanch, has a criminal background and in this regard, he has made a complaint to the Block Development Officer, which has asked for reply.

This Court called upon Mr. B.S.Chahar to apprise where is the prima facie finding and other documents to establish his claim. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to the Block Development Officer for conducting the inquiry and notice is dated 20.03.2017.

In my view, no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and the petition is premature.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court for withdrawal of the present writ petition in order to pursue his complaint. Ordered accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 22, 2017 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2017.05.25 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh