← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/5702/2019allowed

Surinder Kaur And Others v. Sunil Kumar And Another

2025-09-12Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma13 pages

   

 

!"#"$"%&"' ( 

!"#%)*)+",")!'



  

 

-$      

   ' ./ 000 0       

   !"

#     $ % &

 #  '

()*   

++++ 0 0    ,           -  #       .     (/ (0,2

-&  

  - 3      # ,44 ,50 # !   ,266

#      7  - 8" #       # 

        

    #

,(65540)9   . :2; 

 #  # .   !  



 (/ ,0 (0,4 (



#      

#

<  #

  . -& -       # # #

  < -  #  3 #- & 0 000/ 0/0 = 

 #    9  

    

-& -   .     -  

#      &             -   .       #

 -      .

 

     

   #      9*        .  &     .   &-

   #

 

-& -   &-   #  & #  

 #   > *   

 #     .  

 #

. -

   0/ /1 0 $ 8-          

  # Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 2

30*4%","*%! $"$

5   . . 

 #

     #   9 ?30     

            

    

       

              

   

     

 

       

 



     

           

   

         !"#$           

 %#  !"&$

   

 &'   !"($      



 31)

       

        *           (+,                  

(







 



  

  

-  

    

 

     

      

 $           .  /

 

          

                *  

 

                     

  



         

      32 

                   (+,          

   (+,          

        

  

          

             



 

        

    * * * * * * 42. )     

  

    &$          0

 1   $        !2    !(%+ %!

%(

$ 

    

 3!4 %'#+

3!'#!#(

3!(#'&+

3

!&&!&(

 3!#&'(+

  



   

 3!!(!((

35 (''+

34'!'(

 3(''4+

 / $ 8- 

 #National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 2

3037 5  # .  ,44,419 ,46 # !   ,266 #  .

 9

"

@   #  

        A      B

C"

  #    # B

"

  #  -  #  & B

@"



 -  #  

         &  

#  

#

 # A .

  B

D"

E

 #     #

 # ## . % -B #9 & #A  &     #%     9 ?52. 6  conventional heads

    

   

 7/

8*

    7 %(+++       

  7  !+++++  

   7 !+++++ 



 

         

      

   7/

 0  9 

 





       



   

 

  



  

   :    

 

     6                     

     



 



    

   

  

  

   

  ; 

       

          

     

        

   

     

 



   



                 

    

*

     

            

   

 

  

      

 

!(+++  7 &++++     7 !(+++  

     

                    



    <              

  

 

 )     

               

  

    

  

   !+,   

) 

 

 



  





   = = = = = 59.3)    

  (+,    

 





 / 

  &+

    

 #+, 

  

&+ (+

* 

  

 (+'+

    !(,6   

    

 59.4* 







 $ 

   &+,

 



  

    &+

 6  %(,

  

  &+(+

 !+,

  

 (+'+

   

  

 

     59.5.              

          #+#%0> ?  



     59.6. 



          

  0> @ &%/

 59.7 

         59.87   

        

 



 

     

 7

!(+++7 &++++ 7 !(+++

   

    

  !+,  

A

$ 8- 

 # 8, ")"% 9)$*% )+"

,4 ):/;,;!"<-$ )* , 9; $=*=%* ,!="%$2

0 ( 5 #

 0 %9 -"%,  $*4%  % ) :0"!=; 0*4% 

 .  

    #    

9 B216  <

  C  0 8         

  

         

  ;

   

      

 

 *  

D  D  

   



 D     D  D 

 D D  D  

      





 

 

  



    )  

      

       

  

 

 %!! Spousal consortium   

        

         

    



D  

   

     

 /  D %!% Parental consortium      



              

   D    

   

     

   

     D %!# Filial consortium             

  

 

   6

      

          

  

   

    

      

              22   



 

     

       3 /     

 

  

E     

 

       

   

 3 /                

   

             

 

  

      

 23 3>  

6  

    

      

  

 

  

* 

       

              

                

 C        

      

    6 6      

    

      

  

   

           

   

 



          

     

       



               

  !

!!!          # .   .

  .

54&  #  #  # .      .

  - &



-&9  3  = = "..

3'

1>46>>6(  ₹ .

     & #  (00000)9     $ .    

 &   -  

 -     .

  ₹(00000)9  $ .   #%         3

 #  

,0000)9    # # 



  .. 



-#  3.

3  #$ &     ,0 -   # . #     -   #  -& 

    )  '

( 1

 # 

&     '

( 1   %  $ .  .   .      #% 

.   % 

    &# 

 ,, #     -  %  #$ 8- A 

 #National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Birender and others, 2020 (11) SCC 356.$ 8-A  9 D!&* 

      



  

       

  /      

    



   

     

      

          



           

          

  D ,( E$ 8-A  & Jitender Kumar vs.

Sanjay Prasad passed in Civil Appeal No. 719942025 (arising out of SLP (x) Non. 277742023), decided on 22.05.2025  9 !#*         

  

     Birender (supra)    

    F D!&* 

      





  

 

    

 

/      

       



           

     

      



      



 

 

    

        D

14. Such exposition came to be followed by this Court in Seema Rani and Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors., 2025 SCC Online SC 283., wherein it was observed that the application for compensation, even by married sons and

daughters, must be considered, irrespective of whether they are fully dependant or not*  



  

        $

  



  

3        .3   



         $*    

 



         $      

A ,1 * . # -

# %   - &     %    )

 < &

  &

    

* 

 # .

3 

 



     &  

    - 

     

       % &

             #  & #   #    ##  - 

,5  <& < # -



    )   '

( 1     & 

 ,>   # . #       . #  # A 

#    

#

  .

    -   #  . <    #    /0 ,4 * . # .  .-&$ 8-  -

# %        .  .   (/ (0,2

-&  

  - 3  

# 

 &                      #

 #  9*     & 

   99 Sr.

No.

Heads Compensation Awarded ,  &*



,0000)9 ( E

 :(>;

(>00)9 ,0000F(>;"

@    .   

  A,)5

1,(>)9 ,(>00F,)5"

 *



21/>)9 ,(>0091,(>"

>  ,1  @ &

,54(>00)9 21/>F,(F,1"

/ =

#D  

,6000)9 E DA

,6000)9 =

#

   

56000)9A(  

56000F, E 

56000F,

,2(000)9 ! 9,4")$ !;) $ 3> >

?

"<*+!;) . -&-  $

?

)= )+"< ,*)!

$6 ?

3

,/  #    

 -&$ 8-  Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma

( R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation 

 0*4%","*%! $"$ >          :

2;       #

 #   ##  #

    #  G  ,6    '

(9*       &         

          . .- .   #.

 #   #  #

& # %  -   

(  -         - 3

  

 .  (/ (0,2         

# - 3

   -  ,2    # & 

 

 #    0 0     



H     I  3 ) 9  3  J )'

I  -  J