Keshav Aggarwal v. The Debt Recovery Tribunal-Iii Chandigarh And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11187-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.03.2019 Keshav Aggarwal ........ Petitioner vs The Debt Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh and another ...... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present:- Mr.Vikram Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Seerat Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Grover, Advocate for respondent No.2.

*** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside the order dated 17.03.2017 (Annexure P-8) passed by learned Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh and possession notice dated 09.01.2017 (Annexure P-7).

2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies as available to him, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies, as may be available to him, in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL ) 25.03.2019 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No Whether reportable?

Yes/No -36ANJU 2019.03.27 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc