Sumer Singh & ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 1494 of 2016 Decided on : 15.03.2016 Sumer Singh and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH PRESENT: Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the notification dated 07.07.2011, issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'the Act'), followed by notification dated 06.07.2012, issued under Section 6 of the Act and subsequent proceedings. A request for release of land has also been made.

2.

It was not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners that no notice of demand has been raised by the petitioners prior to approaching this Court by way of present writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned authority by filing a detailed and comprehensive representation raising the grievances as have been sought to be raised in the present writ petition. However, a prayer was made for issuance of a time bound direction to the respondents to decide the same.

JAWALA RAM 2016.03.31 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No. 1494 of 2016 [ 2 ] 3.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It is, however, observed that in case such a representation is filed by the petitioners, the same shall be decided by the concerned authority expeditiously by passing a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) March 15, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2016.03.31 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh