Rupinder Singh Virk And ANR v. Debt Recovery Tribunal-Ii And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-14990-2016 Date of decision: 05.08.2016 Rupinder Singh Virk and another ..... Petitioners

Versus

Debts Recovery Tribunal-II and another ..... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for setting aside the order dated 29.06.2016 (Annexure P-5) passed the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chandigarh, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for restoration of SA No. 235 of 2012 which was dismissed in default vide order dated 23.09.2015 (Annexure P-2), was dismissed.

2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies, as may be available to them, in accordance with law.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. ( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE August 05, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2016.08.11 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document