High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/16013/2015disposed of

Rajwati v. State Of Haryana And ORS

2018-11-19Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CWP-16013-2015 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-16013-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: - 19.11.2018 Rajwati ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Bakshi, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) In the present case, the petitioner is asking for the re-fixation of pay of her late husband w.e.f. 01.05.1990 by granting the pay-scale of `1200-2040 and further revised pay-scale of `4000-6000 w.e.f. 01.01.1996.

The contention which has been raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that similarly situated persons have already been granted the said benefit, whereas the same was denied to the husband of the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner further states that the matter is pending since long and for this purpose the petitioner had filed a representation (Annexure P-6) on 30.06.2014. The said representation is NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.22 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-16013-2015 (O&M) -2for the enhanced family pension after re-fixing the pay of her late husband. Counsel for the petitioner further states that even though the matter is pending for the last more than three years, at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is given to the respondent(s) to decide her representation by taking into consideration the various orders passed by this Court, which have been attached as Annexures P-1 to P-3, within a time bound banner.

Counsel for the respondent(s)-State has no objection for granting the said request of the petitioner.

In view of above, let competent authority pass a speaking order on the representation (Annexure P-6) filed by the petitioner by taking into consideration the judgments (Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3) of this Court. The said order be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court expresses no opinion on the merits of the case at this stage. Present writ petition stands disposed of.

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) November 19, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2018.11.22 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh