Raj Pal Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M-36905-2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (123) CRM-M-36905-2021 Date of decision: - 07.09.2021 Raj Pal Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate and Mr. S.S. Momi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. (keeping in view the advance copy given).

( Through Video Conferencing ) *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that in the present petition, onerous conditions have been imposed upon the petitioner for release of the vehicle on superdari and in somewhat similar facts, a Coordinate Bench of this Court while passing the judgment in CRM-M30659-2021 titled 'Sombir Vs. State of Haryana', on 03.08.2021, had modified the similar onerous conditions imposed therein. Notice of motion.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, who has joined the proceedings through video conference, keeping in view the service of advance copy of petition accepts notice on behalf of NARESH KUMAR 2021.09.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-36905-2021 -2respondent-State.

Learned State counsel concedes that the prayer of the petitioner, as raised in the present petition, is covered by the decision in Sombir's case (supra) and he has no objection in case the present petition is disposed of in terms of the modified conditions mentioned in Sombir's case (supra).

Keeping in view the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is also disposed of in terms of Sombir's case (supra).

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) September 07, 2021 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?

Yes Whether reportable?

No NARESH KUMAR 2021.09.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document