← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/14779/2026disposed of

Sumitra Devi v. Debts Recovery Tribunal Ii And ORS

2026-05-27Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14779-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 SUMITRA DEVI

...Petitioner

Versus

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AND ORS

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Sandeep Singh Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Bank ***** SUVIR SEHGAL , J. (ORAL) CM-8832-CWP-2026 Application is allowed, as prayed for.

Annexures appended along with the application are taken on record, and are renumbered as Annexures P-4 to P-8. CWP-14779-2026 1.

Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was proceeded against ex parte before Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) on 02.11.2022 Annexure P-7, without being served and by order dated 06.02.2023 Annexure P-8, Original Application filed by Bank was accepted and a recovery certificate was issued. Counsel states that petitioner has moved an application (MA-104-2025) before the DRT for setting aside ex parte decree. He submits that application is not being adjudicated. HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.30 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-14779-2026 (O&M) (2) 2.

Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DRT to dispose of the application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. 3.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for interim relief before the DRT. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 27, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.30 13:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment