Rahul Verma v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36536-2021 (O&M) Decided on : 08.11.2021 Rahul Verma ...... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present :

Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

**** Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.(Oral) Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC for quashing of FIR No.229 dated 31.12.2020 under Sections 323, 34, 377 and 498-A IPC registered at Police Station Ballabhgarh, District Faridabad and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at, between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of a marital discord between the parties, FIR in question was registered against the petitioner. He further submits that subsequently the matter stands amicably resolved between the parties and they are living together. Vide order dated 07.09.2021 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 07.10.2021 to get their respective statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.

Report dated 26.10.2021 has since been received from the JMIC, Faridabad in pursuance to the direction of this Court. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the SONIA BURA 2021.11.08 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-36536-2021 -2same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will. The trial Court has annexed the original copies of the statement of the parties alongwith its report.

Learned State counsel also submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and the respondent is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question.

In view of the report of the learned JMIC, Faridabad and the principles laid down by the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition(s) is allowed. The aforesaid FIR along with all consequential proceedings arising out of them, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. 08.11.2021 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SONIA BURA 2021.11.08 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh