High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32707/2022allowed

Silochna Devi v. State Of Haryana

2022-08-26Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32707-2022 Date of Decision:-26.08.2022 SILOCHNA DEVI ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ... Respondent(s) -.-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH -.- Present:- Ms. Lipika Dahiya Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

-.- KARAMJIT SINGH , J. (Oral) Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case having FIR No.108 dated 30.06.2020 registered under Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Bhattu Kala, District Fatehabad. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged firing was not committed by the present petitioner and she has been arraigned as an accused only on the ground that fire arm used in alleged firing was licensed weapon of the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner further submitted GAURAV SOROT 2022.08.26 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

( 2 ) CRM-M-32707-2022 that the petitioner has joined investigation by virtue of previous order dated 28.7.2022.

The State counsel on instructions from ASI Parveen Kumar has not disputed the fact that the petitioner has joined investigation with the police. The State counsel further submitted that recovery of fire arm has been effected and the petitioner is not required by police for further investigation or for custodial interrogation. In view of the above as the recovery has already been effected and the only allegations against the petitioner are that her licensed fire arm was misused by her nephew namely Ramesh, no purpose is going to the served even if the petitioner is subject to custodial interrogation at this stage. Thus, without commenting on the merits of the case, present petition is allowed and order dated 28.7.2022 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner should abide by the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( KARAMJIT SINGH) 26.08.2022 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2022.08.26 15:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment