Mohd Alam And ANR v. Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CWP No. 11681 of 2017 Date of Decision: July 05, 2017.
Mohd Alam and another ....Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms.Deepali Puri, Standing counsel, for U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr.Sapan Dhir, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 to 9.
Rajan Gupta, J (Oral) Learned counsel for U.T submits that recommendations as made in order dated 20.3.2017 Annexure P/6 for selection as members of the Wakf Board are not being acted upon and fresh recommendations are being made as per provisions of the Act.
In view of statement made above, no cause of action survives in this petition. Petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. (Rajan Gupta) Judge July 05, 2017.
BB Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No