Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 11684 of 2017 Date of decision: 25.05.2017 Visnu Dutt Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) It is contended that the petitioner has retired on 31.03.2017, however, as on date pension and other retiral benefits have not been released to the petitioner nor his pension papers are being accepted by the respondent-department. In this regard, the petitioner has already approached the department by filing a representation dated 06.04.2017 (Annexure P-5), however, to date no action has been taken thereon. At the present moment, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case his representation dated 06.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) is considered and decided expeditiously. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 06.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Satyawan 2017.05.25 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP No. 11684 of 2017 -2In case, the respondent-department found that there is a merit in the claim of the petitioner, the retiral benefits be released to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter.

25.05.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.05.25 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh