M/S Sh. Ganesh And Company v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.1623 of 2015 Date of Decision.30.01.2015 M/s Sh. Ganesh and Company .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Parmod Kumar Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

The writ petition for enforcement of contract for recovery of money is not competent and the appropriate remedy will be only by means of a civil suit for recovery. If, according to the petitioner, liability is an admitted fact, the petitioner may state so in a suit and take a decree in the manner provided under Order 10 CPC. 2.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 30, 2015 Pankaj* PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.02.02 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document