Vinod Kumar v. State Of Punjab And ORS
Manoj Kumar 2016.08.11 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16982 of 2014 Date of Order: 10.8.2016 Vinod Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:
Mr. C.M. Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harsimran Singh Sethi, Addl.A.G, Punjab.
JASWANT SINGH, J (ORAL) The petitioner was working as Auto Electrician with the Irrigation Department and by way of present writ petition, he is seeking extension of his service after reaching the age of retirement on 31.8.2014. Upon notice, reply has been filed contesting the claim. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per his instructions, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present petition any further.
In view of the aforesaid statement, present petition is dismissed as not pressed.
August 10, 2016 (JASWANT SINGH) manoj JUDGE