Gulab Singh And ANR v. Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10115-2018 Date of Decision: May 17, 2018 Gulab Singh and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Union of India and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN 1.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

Yes/No 2.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.

3.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No .......

Present:

Mr.Tejeshwar Singh, Advocatefor the petitioners. ........

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioners have filed their objections under Section 3(C) of the National Highways Act, 1956 (for brevity,'the 1956 Act') against the Notification issued by National Highway Authority of India under Section 3(A) of the 1956 Act. It is not in dispute that the petitioners have been heard by the Competent Authority yesterday in furtherance of those objections. [2] We have no reason to doubt that the Competent Authority will consider and decide those objections in accordance with law before any further notification is issued. The prescribed Authority is directed to decide the objections within two months [3] Disposed of.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE May 17, 2018 ( SHEKHER DHAWAN ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.05.18 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh