Vikram Tyagi v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-28005-2025 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28005-2025

Reserved on: 01.10.2025

Pronounced on: 28.10.2025 Vikram Tyagi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Section 22.08.2023 City Bhiwani, Distt.

Bhiwani, Haryana 174-A IPC 1.

Seeking quashing of FIR mentioned, the petitioner has come up before this court under Section 528 BNSS.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that present FIR is an outcome of order dated 27.01.2020 whereby petitioner was declared proclaimed offender. He further submits that in earlier FIR, compromise has been effected. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner further submits that based on compromise, main FIR stands quashed vide order dated 27.05.2025 passed in CRM-M-21551-2025 qua the petitioner. Since, the main FIR has already been quashed, as such, ancillary proceedings under Section 174-A also deserve to be quashed. 4.

After the quashing of the FIR, the petitioner had come up before this Court by filing the present petition on 16th May, 2025, for quashing the FIR registered under Section 174-A of IPC.

5.

The State has filed the reply, and they oppose the quashing of the FIR but do not dispute the facts.

6.

The primary matter has already been settled between the parties. 7.

In the petition, the petitioner explains that due to a miscommunication of dates between him and his counsel, he could not appear. JYOTI 2025.10.28 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-28005-2025 --2-- 8.

The present FIR under Section 174-A of IPC was registered because of the petitioner's non-appearance in the main case. Now, when the main case itself has been settled between the parties, FIR has been quashed, there would be no justification to continue the secondary case. On this ground alone, the present petition deserves to be allowed, and the FIR registered against the petitioner under Section 174-A IPC must be quashed.

9.

Consequently, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, the above captioned FIR (Annexure P-1) and all emanating proceedings are quashed qua the petitioner. The bail bonds and surety bonds, if any, furnished by the petitioner shall stand discharged.

10.

Petition allowed. All pending applications, if any, stand closed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.10.2025 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

JYOTI 2025.10.28 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.