Deepika Kaushal And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And Another
!"#"$%&%'( )
(* +,,, !" #$ % &%#%'
$
(
!" )* , -./ 01 + , - - $ "- ./ - 0
!"# 0%$",! !%'
,"$!%'& +12 3434*3*4 - " .- 4*3+*3 5/% * 5" ! ./ -$ -
0" $-
$$ *637*3*1
$ "
8 $21*6 9 %
.-0 )+0
0
- 0
0 "
-" 0$ 0 :" *637*3*1
*
0 $! 4
0 -"" )+; $ )+ $! * *< 3338 0! - $ 0 "
0 - :" - 1++**3*1
" 0 0 "
0 $- "
0 $ $$0 - - =
$$ -"" $ " "
$ " $ ./ ! $"$ !- 0 $ ! " $"- 0 "
0
- %
> $ .-!3?3?*3*4 1 / $ - " ! -
" " :" $ " $ $0 - 0 !0
0 , -0
"! 0 "
-$!" " " ; ? *< 3338 -"!-
" , :" ! , "
$ 9 , ! $)"! -" , $ !-:- - 4 - / -
!"(
- "
)* $ $!0 $!
$ !-:-- < / ! " " -
$ !$ $ " ? ,
$ ! "
" " "
" - " $ 0$
- "$ $ 0 $ "
0 $ $$-""
" " $
- ""0 "
!
0
""
- - " 0 "
-" $ - :" $
0
0 0 "" $ " 9 -$ $$ ""
" !-$$,
$ ./ " "
"
"
- "4*3/% 0 " +*3 5 /% $ / !
:
:"
! - ! $
- %" % %
" -!-0
-:" ! .rom the allegations in the FIR, a prima facie case to prove the factum of commission of offence of cheating has been made out as against the petitioners. The well settled proposition of law is that while considering an application for grant of anticipatory bail, the Court has to consider the nature of the offence, the role of the person, likelihood of his inflencing the course of investigation or tampering with evidence as well as likelihood of fleeing justice. It is also well established that an accused does not become entitled to grant of anticipatory bail as a matter of right if his custodial interrogation is not required.
In this case, custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required for conducting thorough investigation in the matter as well as for eliciting information about the manner in which the subject offence was committed. More so, no extraordinary or exceptional circumstance warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court has been made out in favour of the petitioners. As such, I am of the considered opinion that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
) Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
7 / 0! "
- ! -!
-" :
" ., 1 )
= $8 @ 8) = - @ 8)