High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/15469/2016dismissed

Mohan Lal v. Union Of India And ORS.

2016-08-03Mr Justice Jaswant Singh2 pages

CWP No. 15469 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 15469 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.08.2016 ...

Mohan Lal ................Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.B. Bajanthri Present: Mr. Manoj K. Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

...

P.B. Bajanthri, J. (Oral) In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to take him to duty with all consequential benefits or in the alternative to decide his representation dated 8.1.2016 (Annexure P-3).

2) The petitioner was stated to be appointed as a Sweeper on 12.3.1987. It seems petitioner's services were terminated on 10.6.1988, which was subject matter of the litigation. This Court in CWP No. 8262 of 1990, directed the respondents to decide his representation within a period of 6 months. On 14.3.1995, the Food Corporation of India passed an order that the petitioner is not entitled for any service benefits including regularization. Thereafter petitioner kept quite upto the year 2010. In the year 2010 he raised an industrial dispute. The Industrial Tribunal rejected his claim. Thereafter the petitioner did not challenge the findings of the Banita Chugh 2016.08.06 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CWP No. 15469 of 2016 -2Labour Court, on the contrary he submitted a representation to the respondents to take him to duty.

3) Having regard to the conduct of the petitioner, as well as, delay and latches in the matter, this Court proceeded to dismiss the present writ petition. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner sought for withdrawing the petition. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.

4) The Civil Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. ( P.B. Bajanthri ) 3.8.2016 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2016.08.06 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh